Ecuador vs Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16
Ecuador
79.17
in 2019
Oman
79.7
in 2019
Ecuador rank
64th
Oman rank
63rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time
- Ecuador
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 79.7 against 79.17 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 64th and Oman ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Ecuador or Oman?
- Oman, at 79.7 against 79.17 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Ecuador and Oman?
- 0.53, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Oman?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
- Ecuador ranks 64th and Oman ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.