Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Namibia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Namibia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Namibia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Namibia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 87.92 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

87.92

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

45th

of 188 countries

All-time high

87.92

in 2014

All-time low

87.92

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Namibia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Namibia is 87.92, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Namibia ranks 45th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Namibia

42 El Salvador 89.31 compare
43 Eswatini 88.8 compare
44 Malawi 88.04 compare
46 Lesotho 87.5 compare
46 North Macedonia 87.5 compare
48 Canada 85.68 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Namibia

Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 120.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0853 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.099 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 116.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0026 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.194 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,807 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,772 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 22.61 (2050)

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Namibia?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Namibia was 87.92 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Namibia?: The highest recorded value was 87.92 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Namibia?: The lowest recorded value was 87.92 in 2014.
How does Namibia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Namibia ranks 45th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Namibia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Namibia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.