How does Eswatini rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Eswatini ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Eswatini?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Eswatini data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Eswatini

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Eswatini
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 88.8 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

88.8

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

43rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

88.8

in 2014

All-time low

88.8

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Eswatini, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Eswatini recorded 88.8 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Eswatini ranks 43rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Eswatini

40 Ethiopia 90 compare
41 Norway 89.58 compare
42 El Salvador 89.31 compare
44 Malawi 88.04 compare
45 Namibia 87.92 compare
46 Lesotho 87.5 compare
46 North Macedonia 87.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Eswatini

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
Country level monthly temperature anomalies -0.5399 (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies 0.3694 (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 1.45 (2026)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 6.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.21 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,474 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 947.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 2.56 (2050)

All data for Eswatini →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Eswatini?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Eswatini was 88.8 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Eswatini?: The highest recorded value was 88.8 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Eswatini?: The lowest recorded value was 88.8 in 2014.
How does Eswatini rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Eswatini ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Eswatini?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.