Lesotho vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Lesotho
87.5
in 2019
Namibia
87.92
in 2019
Lesotho rank
46th
Namibia rank
45th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Lesotho
  • Namibia
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 87.92 against 87.5 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.42.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 46th and Namibia ranks 45th of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Lesotho or Namibia?
Namibia, at 87.92 against 87.5 in Lesotho as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Lesotho and Namibia?
0.42, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Lesotho and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Lesotho ranks 46th and Namibia ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.