How does Azerbaijan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Azerbaijan ranks 76th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Azerbaijan?

Over the last ten years it is up 15.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Azerbaijan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Azerbaijan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Azerbaijan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 75 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

76th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2016

All-time low

64.75

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Azerbaijan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Azerbaijan recorded 75 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 15.8% over ten years.

Azerbaijan ranks 76th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Azerbaijan

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Azerbaijan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)

All data for Azerbaijan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Azerbaijan?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Azerbaijan was 75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Azerbaijan?: The highest recorded value was 75 in 2016.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Azerbaijan?: The lowest recorded value was 64.75 in 2014.
How does Azerbaijan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Azerbaijan ranks 76th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Azerbaijan?: Over the last ten years it is up 15.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.