Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Luxembourg
Luxembourg: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 77.89 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Luxembourg, 2006–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Luxembourg is 77.89, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and up 7.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Luxembourg peaked at 77.89 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 71.57, in 2008.
That places Luxembourg 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Luxembourg, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 72.51 | — |
| 2007 | 74.82 | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 71.57 | -4.3% |
| 2009 | 71.72 | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 72.01 | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 74.48 | +3.4% |
| 2012 | 75.86 | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 76.72 | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 77.89 | +1.5% |
Luxembourg compared with similar countries
- Luxembourg's 77.89 is below the median for high income countries, which is 87.04, 89% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Luxembourg's 77.89 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.43, 96% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.65 | 71.57 | 74.82 | 4 |
| 2010s | 75.39 | 72.01 | 77.89 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Luxembourg
- 116 Cameroon 78.89 compare
- 117 Cote d'Ivoire 78.65 compare
- 117 Equatorial Guinea 78.65 compare
- 120 Bolivia 77.56 compare
- 121 Guinea-Bissau 77.39 compare
- 122 Honduras 77.34 compare
More reference data data for Luxembourg
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.041 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0209 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1381 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0065 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1381 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1376 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.099 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1147 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6709 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0353 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Luxembourg?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Luxembourg was 77.89 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Luxembourg?
- The highest recorded value was 77.89 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Luxembourg?
- The lowest recorded value was 71.57 in 2008.
- How does Luxembourg rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Luxembourg ranks 119th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in Luxembourg?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Luxembourg data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.