Cameroon vs Luxembourg: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Cameroon
78.89
in 2014
Luxembourg
77.89
in 2014
Cameroon rank
115th
Luxembourg rank
118th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Cameroon
  • Luxembourg
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 78.89 against 77.89 in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Cameroon has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 115th and Luxembourg ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 80.38 72.65 7.73 Cameroon
2010s 76.22 75.39 0.8274 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Cameroon or Luxembourg?
Cameroon, at 78.89 against 77.89 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Cameroon and Luxembourg?
1, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Cameroon and Luxembourg rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Cameroon ranks 115th and Luxembourg ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.