Bolivia vs Luxembourg: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Bolivia
77.56
in 2014
Luxembourg
77.89
in 2014
Bolivia rank
119th
Luxembourg rank
118th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Bolivia
  • Luxembourg
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 77.89 against 77.56 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.33.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Bolivia ranks 119th and Luxembourg ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 59.34 72.65 13.31 Luxembourg
2010s 72.14 75.39 3.26 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Bolivia or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 77.89 against 77.56 in Bolivia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Bolivia and Luxembourg?
0.33, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Luxembourg rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Bolivia ranks 119th and Luxembourg ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.