Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Turkey?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Turkey data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Turkey

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Turkey
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Turkey: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 86.25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

86.25

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

61st

of 188 countries

All-time high

86.25

in 2014

All-time low

86.25

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Turkey, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Turkey recorded 86.25 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Turkey 61st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Turkey

58 Bulgaria 87.08 compare
59 Philippines 86.88 compare
60 Japan 86.5 compare
63 Sri Lanka 85.6 compare
64 India 85.51 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Turkey

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.815 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.96 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.31 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.72 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.31 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 53.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 103 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.35 (2050)

All data for Turkey →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Turkey?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Turkey was 86.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Turkey?: The highest recorded value was 86.25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Turkey?: The lowest recorded value was 86.25 in 2014.
How does Turkey rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Turkey ranks 61st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Turkey?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Turkey data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.