How does Japan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?

Japan ranks 60th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Japan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Japan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Japan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Japan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 86.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

86.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

60th

of 188 countries

All-time high

86.5

in 2014

All-time low

86.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Japan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Japan stood at 86.5. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Japan ranks 60th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Japan

58 Bulgaria 87.08 compare
59 Philippines 86.88 compare
61 South Africa 86.25 compare
61 Turkey 86.25 compare
63 Sri Lanka 85.6 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Japan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.49 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.52 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0529 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3629 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,290 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.74 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1,056 (2050)

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Japan?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Japan was 86.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Japan?: The highest recorded value was 86.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Japan?: The lowest recorded value was 86.5 in 2014.
How does Japan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Japan ranks 60th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Japan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.