Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Vanuatu?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Vanuatu data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 33.11 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

33.11

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

158th

of 188 countries

All-time high

33.11

in 2014

All-time low

33.11

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Vanuatu, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Vanuatu recorded 33.11 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Vanuatu 158th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Vanuatu

155 Comoros 38.6 compare
156 Kuwait 37.26 compare
157 Papua New Guinea 33.96 compare
159 Belize 33.02 compare
160 Saint Lucia 32.31 compare
161 Namibia 29.72 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Vanuatu

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 15.46 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4612 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0658 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0001 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0583 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5199 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 155.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0262 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.089 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 137.76 (2050)

All data for Vanuatu →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Vanuatu?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Vanuatu was 33.11 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Vanuatu?: The highest recorded value was 33.11 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Vanuatu?: The lowest recorded value was 33.11 in 2014.
How does Vanuatu rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Vanuatu ranks 158th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Vanuatu?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Vanuatu data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.