Kuwait vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Kuwait
37.26
in 2019
Vanuatu
33.11
in 2019
Kuwait rank
156th
Vanuatu rank
158th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Kuwait
  • Vanuatu
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 37.26 against 33.11 in Vanuatu, a difference of 4.15.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 156th and Vanuatu ranks 158th of 188 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Kuwait or Vanuatu?
Kuwait, at 37.26 against 33.11 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Kuwait and Vanuatu?
4.15, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Vanuatu?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Kuwait ranks 156th and Vanuatu ranks 158th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.