Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Comoros

Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 38.6 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
38.6
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
158th
of 191 countries
All-time high
38.6
in 2014
All-time low
38.6
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Comoros, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 38.62015: 38.62016: 38.62017: 38.62018: 38.62019: 38.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Comoros recorded 38.6 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Comoros ranks 158th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Comoros, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Comoros, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 38.6 —
2015 38.6 +0.0%
2016 38.6 +0.0%
2017 38.6 +0.0%
2018 38.6 +0.0%
2019 38.6 +0.0%

Comoros compared with similar countries

  • Comoros's 38.6 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 64.62, 60% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Comoros's 38.6 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 53.54, 72% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Comoros

  1. 157 Cape Verde 39.53 compare
  2. 159 Kuwait 37.26 compare
  3. 160 Papua New Guinea 33.96 compare
  4. 161 Vanuatu 33.11 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Comoros

All data for Comoros →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Comoros?
Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Comoros was 38.6 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Comoros?
The highest recorded value was 38.6 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Comoros?
The lowest recorded value was 38.6 in 2014.
How does Comoros rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
Comoros ranks 158th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Comoros?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Comoros data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Comoros. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/comoros/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Comoros</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.