Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Armenia?

Over the last ten years it is up 18.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Armenia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Armenia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Armenia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Armenia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 90.57 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

90.57

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

35th

of 188 countries

All-time high

90.57

in 2015

All-time low

76.42

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Armenia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Armenia recorded 90.57 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 18.5% over ten years.

Armenia ranks 35th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Armenia

32 Ukraine 92.92 compare
33 Moldova 92.82 compare
34 Montenegro 91.98 compare
36 North Macedonia 90.33 compare
37 Nepal 90.3 compare
38 Burundi 89.73 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Armenia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0385 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3778 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7338 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.7338 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.129 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1012 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1265 (2050)

All data for Armenia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Armenia?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Armenia was 90.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Armenia?: The highest recorded value was 90.57 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Armenia?: The lowest recorded value was 76.42 in 2014.
How does Armenia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Armenia ranks 35th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Armenia?: Over the last ten years it is up 18.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Armenia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.