Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Guinea?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Guinea data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 26.62 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

26.62

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

166th

of 188 countries

All-time high

26.62

in 2014

All-time low

26.62

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Guinea is 26.62, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Guinea ranks 166th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Guinea

163 Equatorial Guinea 28.3 compare
164 South Sudan 28.07 compare
165 Australia 27.74 compare
167 Nigeria 25.88 compare
168 Paraguay 23.11 compare
169 Angola 22.17 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.81 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 386.84 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 9.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 15,072 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 7,415 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 3,544 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 59.42 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 4,157 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.63 (2050)

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Guinea?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Guinea was 26.62 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Guinea?: The highest recorded value was 26.62 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Guinea?: The lowest recorded value was 26.62 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Guinea ranks 166th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Guinea?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guinea data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.