Guinea vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Guinea
26.62
in 2019
Nigeria
25.88
in 2019
Guinea rank
166th
Nigeria rank
167th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Guinea
  • Nigeria
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 26.62 against 25.88 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.74.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 166th and Nigeria ranks 167th of 188 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Guinea or Nigeria?
Guinea, at 26.62 against 25.88 in Nigeria as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Guinea and Nigeria?
0.74, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Nigeria?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Guinea ranks 166th and Nigeria ranks 167th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.