Angola vs Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Angola
22.17
in 2019
Guinea
26.62
in 2019
Angola rank
169th
Guinea rank
166th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Angola
  • Guinea
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 26.62 against 22.17 in Angola, a difference of 4.45.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 169th and Guinea ranks 166th of 188 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Angola or Guinea?
Guinea, at 26.62 against 22.17 in Angola as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Angola and Guinea?
4.45, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guinea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Angola and Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Angola ranks 169th and Guinea ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.