Cape Verde vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Cape Verde
39.53
in 2019
Comoros
38.6
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
154th
Comoros rank
155th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Comoros
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 39.53 against 38.6 in Comoros, a difference of 0.93.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Comoros ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 154th and Comoros ranks 155th of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Cape Verde or Comoros?
Cape Verde, at 39.53 against 38.6 in Comoros as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Cape Verde and Comoros?
0.93, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Comoros?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Cape Verde ranks 154th and Comoros ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.