Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in South Sudan
South Sudan: Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) was 360 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in South Sudan, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
South Sudan recorded 360 DB16-20 methodology for time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places South Sudan 2nd out of 189 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 360 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
South Sudan compared with similar countries
- South Sudan's 360 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for low income countries, which is 108 DB16-20 methodology, 3.3× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- South Sudan's 360 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 77 DB16-20 methodology, 4.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 1 Venezuela 1,090 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 3 Afghanistan 324 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 4 Egypt 265 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 5 Equatorial Guinea 240 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 5 Tanzania 240 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for South Sudan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.41 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3667 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0368 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 27.22 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8628 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 325.82 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 10,990 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 26,453 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 8,797 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in South Sudan?
- Time to import: documentary compliance (hours) in South Sudan was 360 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 360 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest time to import: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 360 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does South Sudan rank for time to import: documentary compliance (hours)?
- South Sudan ranks 2nd out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is time to import: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Time to import: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The time for documentary compliance to import records the time associated with compliance with the import documentary requirements of all government agencies of the origin economy, the destination economy and any transit economies. It is calculated in hours. It includes the time for obtaining documents, preparing documents, processing documents, presenting documents and submitting documents. All electronic or paper submissions of information requested by any government agency in connection with the shipment are considered to be documents obtained, prepared and submitted during the import process. All documents prepared by the freight forwarder or customs broker for the product and partner pair assumed in the case study are included regardless of whether they are required by law or in practice. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.