Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania
Lithuania: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in was 39.3% in 2017. ▬ Flat
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania, 2003–2017
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania is 39.3%, measured in 2017.
The figure is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 27.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania peaked at 42.2% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 27.4%, in 2014.
That places Lithuania 17th out of 35 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 42.2% | — |
| 2004 | 37.0% | -12.3% |
| 2005 | 34.6% | -6.5% |
| 2006 | 34.4% | -0.6% |
| 2007 | 30.9% | -10.0% |
| 2008 | 32.0% | +3.5% |
| 2009 | 40.1% | +25.3% |
| 2010 | 34.6% | -13.9% |
| 2011 | 33.8% | -2.3% |
| 2012 | 29.3% | -13.1% |
| 2014 | 27.4% | -6.5% |
| 2015 | 38.6% | +40.9% |
| 2016 | 39.1% | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 39.3% | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.9% | 30.9% | 42.2% | 7 |
| 2010s | 34.6% | 27.4% | 39.3% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania?
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Lithuania was 39.3% in 2017, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 42.2% in 2003.
- What is the lowest teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 27.4% in 2014.
- How does Lithuania rank for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Lithuania ranks 17th out of 35 countries with data for 2017.
- Is teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 27.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/