Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Libya
Libya: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index was 2 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Libya, 2005–2025
Source: Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for stability of democratic institutions index in Libya is 2, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, stability of democratic institutions index in Libya peaked at 3 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 1, in 2005.
That places Libya 84th out of 128 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Libya, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 | — |
| 2007 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 | +100.0% |
| 2011 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 | +50.0% |
| 2015 | 2 | -33.3% |
| 2017 | 2.5 | +25.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | -20.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | +0.0% |
Libya compared with similar countries
- Libya's 2 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5, 40% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Libya's 2 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 2, 1.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.33 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2010s | 2.3 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Libya
- 84 Azerbaijan 2 compare
- 84 Belarus 2 compare
- 84 Burundi 2 compare
- 84 Cameroon 2 compare
- 84 Congo 2 compare
- 84 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 compare
- 84 Egypt 2 compare
- 84 Guinea 2 compare
- 84 Iran 2 compare
- 84 Kazakhstan 2 compare
- 84 Morocco 2 compare
- 84 Nicaragua 2 compare
- 84 Oman 2 compare
- 84 Pakistan 2 compare
- 84 Russia 2 compare
- 84 Rwanda 2 compare
- 84 South Sudan 2 compare
- 84 United Arab Emirates 2 compare
- 84 Uzbekistan 2 compare
- 84 Venezuela 2 compare
More reference data data for Libya
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0637 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.021 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2136 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0873 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1144 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is stability of democratic institutions index in Libya?
- Stability of democratic institutions index in Libya was 2 in 2025, according to Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 3 in 2013.
- What is the lowest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2005.
- How does Libya rank for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Libya ranks 84th out of 128 countries with data for 2025.
- Is stability of democratic institutions index rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.