Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Belarus
Belarus: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index was 2 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Belarus, 2005–2025
Source: Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, stability of democratic institutions index in Belarus stood at 2. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, stability of democratic institutions index in Belarus peaked at 2.5 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 2, in 2005.
Belarus ranks 84th of 128 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 | — |
| 2007 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 | +25.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | -20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | +0.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 2 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5, 40% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 2 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 6.5, 31% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 2010s | 2.2 | 2 | 2.5 | 5 |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 84 Azerbaijan 2 compare
- 84 Burundi 2 compare
- 84 Cameroon 2 compare
- 84 Congo 2 compare
- 84 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 compare
- 84 Egypt 2 compare
- 84 Guinea 2 compare
- 84 Iran 2 compare
- 84 Kazakhstan 2 compare
- 84 Libya 2 compare
- 84 Morocco 2 compare
- 84 Nicaragua 2 compare
- 84 Oman 2 compare
- 84 Pakistan 2 compare
- 84 Russia 2 compare
- 84 Rwanda 2 compare
- 84 South Sudan 2 compare
- 84 United Arab Emirates 2 compare
- 84 Uzbekistan 2 compare
- 84 Venezuela 2 compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is stability of democratic institutions index in Belarus?
- Stability of democratic institutions index in Belarus was 2 in 2025, according to Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 in 2017.
- What is the lowest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 in 2005.
- How does Belarus rank for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Belarus ranks 84th out of 128 countries with data for 2025.
- Is stability of democratic institutions index rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.