Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index was 2 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kazakhstan, 2005–2025
Source: Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, stability of democratic institutions index in Kazakhstan stood at 2. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, stability of democratic institutions index in Kazakhstan peaked at 2 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2, in 2005.
That places Kazakhstan 84th out of 128 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 | — |
| 2007 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 | +0.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 2 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5, 40% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 2 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 6.5, 31% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 84 Azerbaijan 2 compare
- 84 Belarus 2 compare
- 84 Burundi 2 compare
- 84 Cameroon 2 compare
- 84 Congo 2 compare
- 84 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 compare
- 84 Egypt 2 compare
- 84 Guinea 2 compare
- 84 Iran 2 compare
- 84 Libya 2 compare
- 84 Morocco 2 compare
- 84 Nicaragua 2 compare
- 84 Oman 2 compare
- 84 Pakistan 2 compare
- 84 Russia 2 compare
- 84 Rwanda 2 compare
- 84 South Sudan 2 compare
- 84 United Arab Emirates 2 compare
- 84 Uzbekistan 2 compare
- 84 Venezuela 2 compare
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is stability of democratic institutions index in Kazakhstan?
- Stability of democratic institutions index in Kazakhstan was 2 in 2025, according to Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 2 in 2005.
- What is the lowest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 in 2005.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Kazakhstan ranks 84th out of 128 countries with data for 2025.
- Is stability of democratic institutions index rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.