Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta

Malta: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 1.3 in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
1.3
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
45th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.86
in 1988
All-time low
0.07
in 1965
Years of data
126
1900–2025

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta, 1900–2025

00.511.52190019622025

Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

Malta recorded 1.3 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Malta peaked at 1.86 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.07, in 1965.

That places Malta 45th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta, year by year

Annual values for Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta, 1900 to 2025.
Year Value Change
1900 1.38
1901 1.38 +0.0%
1902 1.38 +0.0%
1903 1.38 +0.0%
1904 1.38 +0.0%
1905 1.38 +0.0%
1906 1.38 +0.0%
1907 1.38 +0.0%
1908 1.38 +0.0%
1909 1.38 +0.0%
1910 1.38 +0.0%
1911 1.38 +0.0%
1912 1.38 +0.0%
1913 1.38 +0.0%
1914 1.38 +0.0%
1915 1.38 +0.0%
1916 1.38 +0.0%
1917 1.38 +0.0%
1918 1.38 +0.0%
1919 1.38 +0.0%
1920 1.38 +0.0%
1921 1.38 +0.0%
1922 1.38 +0.0%
1923 1.38 +0.0%
1924 1.38 +0.0%
1925 1.38 +0.0%
1926 1.38 +0.0%
1927 1.38 +0.0%
1928 1.38 +0.0%
1929 1.38 +0.0%
1930 1.38 +0.0%
1931 1.38 +0.0%
1932 1.38 +0.0%
1933 1.38 +0.0%
1934 1.38 +0.0%
1935 1.38 +0.0%
1936 1.38 +0.0%
1937 1.38 +0.0%
1938 1.38 +0.0%
1939 1.38 +0.0%
1940 1.38 +0.0%
1941 1.38 +0.0%
1942 1.38 +0.0%
1943 1.38 +0.0%
1944 1.38 +0.0%
1945 1.38 +0.0%
1946 1.38 +0.0%
1947 1.38 +0.0%
1948 1.38 +0.0%
1949 1.38 +0.0%
1950 1.38 +0.0%
1951 1.38 +0.0%
1952 1.38 +0.0%
1953 1.38 +0.0%
1954 1.38 +0.0%
1955 1.38 +0.0%
1956 1.38 +0.0%
1957 1.38 +0.0%
1958 1.38 +0.0%
1959 1.38 +0.0%
1960 1.38 +0.0%
1961 1.38 +0.0%
1962 1.38 +0.0%
1963 1.38 +0.0%
1964 1.38 +0.0%
1965 0.07 -94.9%
1966 0.07 +0.0%
1967 0.07 +0.0%
1968 0.07 +0.0%
1969 0.07 +0.0%
1970 0.07 +0.0%
1971 0.07 +0.0%
1972 0.07 +0.0%
1973 0.07 +0.0%
1974 0.07 +0.0%
1975 0.07 +0.0%
1976 0.07 +0.0%
1977 0.07 +0.0%
1978 0.07 +0.0%
1979 0.07 +0.0%
1980 0.07 +0.0%
1981 0.07 +0.0%
1982 0.07 +0.0%
1983 0.07 +0.0%
1984 0.07 +0.0%
1985 0.07 +0.0%
1986 0.07 +0.0%
1987 0.07 +0.0%
1988 1.86 +2551.4%
1989 1.86 +0.0%
1990 1.86 +0.0%
1991 1.86 +0.0%
1992 1.86 +0.0%
1993 1.86 +0.0%
1994 1.86 +0.0%
1995 1.86 +0.0%
1996 1.86 +0.0%
1997 1.86 +0.0%
1998 1.86 +0.0%
1999 1.86 +0.0%
2000 1.86 +0.0%
2001 1.86 +0.0%
2002 1.86 +0.0%
2003 1.86 +0.0%
2004 1.86 +0.0%
2005 1.86 +0.0%
2006 1.86 +0.0%
2007 1.86 +0.0%
2008 1.86 +0.0%
2009 1.86 +0.0%
2010 1.86 +0.0%
2011 1.86 +0.0%
2012 1.86 +0.0%
2013 1.53 -17.3%
2014 1.32 -14.2%
2015 1.32 +0.0%
2016 1.07 -19.0%
2017 1.07 +0.0%
2018 1.07 +0.0%
2019 1.07 +0.0%
2020 1.07 +0.0%
2021 1.3 +21.8%
2022 1.3 +0.0%
2023 1.3 +0.0%
2024 1.3 +0.0%
2025 1.3 +0.0%

Malta compared with similar countries

  • Malta's 1.3 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 82% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Malta's 1.3 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.364. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1900s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1910s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1920s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1930s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1940s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1950s 1.38 1.38 1.38 10
1960s 0.7265 0.07 1.38 10
1970s 0.07 0.07 0.07 10
1980s 0.4272 0.07 1.86 10
1990s 1.86 1.86 1.86 10
2000s 1.86 1.86 1.86 10
2010s 1.4 1.07 1.86 10
2020s 1.26 1.07 1.3 6

Countries ranked near Malta

  1. 42 Chile 1.41 compare
  2. 43 Poland 1.33 compare
  3. 44 Cyprus 1.32 compare
  4. 46 Montenegro 1.29 compare
  5. 47 Togo 1.29 compare
  6. 47 Vanuatu 1.29 compare

See the full ranking of 176 places →

More reference data data for Malta

All data for Malta →

Frequently asked questions

What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Malta?
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Malta was 1.3 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Malta?
The highest recorded value was 1.86 in 1988.
What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Malta?
The lowest recorded value was 0.07 in 1965.
How does Malta rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
Malta ranks 45th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Malta?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Malta data come from?
The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 126 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta. Statizoid, drawing on V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/rigorous-and-impartial-public-administration-score/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/rigorous-and-impartial-public-administration-score/malta/">Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Malta</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,350 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.