Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Chile
Chile: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 1.41 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.41
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
42nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.19
in 1990
All-time low
-2.43
in 1814
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Chile, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Chile recorded 1.41 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
That represents a change of down 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Chile peaked at 2.19 in 1990 and was at its lowest, -2.43, in 1814.
That places Chile 42nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.79 | — |
| 1790 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.36 | -24.3% |
| 1811 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.43 | +79.2% |
| 1815 | -2.43 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.43 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.43 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.43 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.33 | -45.2% |
| 1820 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.33 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.47 | -64.8% |
| 1831 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.47 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.005 | -98.9% |
| 1841 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.005 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.471 | +9320.0% |
| 1851 | -0.471 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.019 | -96.0% |
| 1853 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.019 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.452 | +2278.9% |
| 1860 | -0.013 | -97.1% |
| 1861 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.013 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.476 | +3561.5% |
| 1881 | -0.476 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.476 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.476 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.012 | -102.5% |
| 1885 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.881 | -7441.7% |
| 1891 | -0.881 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.854 | -196.9% |
| 1893 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.356 | -58.3% |
| 1925 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.26 | +255.3% |
| 1934 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1.26 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1.4 | +10.9% |
| 1939 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 1.4 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 1.1 | -21.6% |
| 1948 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1.1 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1.4 | +27.4% |
| 1960 | 1.79 | +27.6% |
| 1961 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 1.79 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1.45 | -18.7% |
| 1971 | 1.45 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1.45 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.29 | -80.1% |
| 1974 | -0.753 | -359.7% |
| 1975 | -0.753 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.753 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.753 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.753 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.753 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.54 | -28.3% |
| 1981 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.54 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.924 | -271.1% |
| 1990 | 2.19 | +136.9% |
| 1991 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.19 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.84 | -16.0% |
| 2014 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.84 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.41 | -23.6% |
| 2020 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.41 | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 1.41 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 89% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Chile's 1.41 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 2.7× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.79 | -1.79 | -1.79 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.79 | -1.79 | -1.79 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.79 | -1.79 | -1.79 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.89 | -2.43 | -1.33 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.33 | -1.33 | -1.33 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.47 | -0.47 | -0.47 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.005 | -0.005 | -0.005 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.1527 | -0.471 | -0.019 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.013 | -0.013 | -0.013 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.013 | -0.013 | -0.013 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.1832 | -0.476 | 0.012 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.507 | -0.881 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.5552 | 0.356 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.02 | 0.356 | 1.4 | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.31 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.13 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.79 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0134 | -0.753 | 1.45 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3936 | -0.54 | 0.924 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.9 | 1.41 | 2.19 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.41 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Chile?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Chile was 1.41 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 2.19 in 1990.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.43 in 1814.
- How does Chile rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Chile ranks 42nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.