Malta vs Togo: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Malta
1.3
in 2025
Togo
1.29
in 2025
Malta rank
45th
Togo rank
47th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Malta
- Togo
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1.3 against 1.29 in Togo, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 45th and Togo ranks 47th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 9 and Togo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1.38 | 1.18 | 0.207 | Malta |
| 1920s | 1.38 | 1.18 | 0.207 | Malta |
| 1930s | 1.38 | 1.18 | 0.207 | Malta |
| 1940s | 1.38 | 1.18 | 0.207 | Malta |
| 1950s | 1.38 | 1.18 | 0.207 | Malta |
| 1960s | 0.7265 | 1.35 | 0.6282 | Togo |
| 1970s | 0.07 | 0.996 | 0.926 | Togo |
| 1980s | 0.4272 | 0.996 | 0.5688 | Togo |
| 1990s | 1.86 | -0.3983 | 2.25 | Malta |
| 2000s | 1.86 | -0.6953 | 2.55 | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.4 | -0.1259 | 1.53 | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.0008 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Malta or Togo?
- Malta, at 1.3 against 1.29 in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Malta and Togo?
- 0.01, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Togo?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Togo rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Malta ranks 45th and Togo ranks 47th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.