Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Brazil
Brazil: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 1.43 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.43
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
41st
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.43
in 2023
All-time low
-1.78
in 1789
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Brazil, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Brazil stood at 1.43. That is the highest value across all 237 years on record.
The figure is up 17.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Brazil peaked at 1.43 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.78, in 1789.
That places Brazil 41st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.78 | — |
| 1790 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.38 | -22.2% |
| 1940 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.604 | -56.3% |
| 1946 | -0.41 | -32.1% |
| 1947 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.41 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.32 | +221.7% |
| 1965 | -1.55 | +17.6% |
| 1966 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.73 | -52.9% |
| 1986 | -0.514 | -29.6% |
| 1987 | -0.514 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.108 | -121.0% |
| 1989 | 0.326 | +201.9% |
| 1990 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.572 | +75.5% |
| 1996 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.731 | +27.8% |
| 2001 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.731 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.22 | +66.9% |
| 2006 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.22 | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 1.08 | -11.1% |
| 2018 | 1.03 | -4.9% |
| 2019 | 0.499 | -51.5% |
| 2020 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.459 | -8.0% |
| 2023 | 1.43 | +212.0% |
| 2024 | 1.43 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.43 | +0.0% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 1.43 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 19.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 1.43 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 2.8× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.78 | -1.78 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.74 | -1.78 | -1.38 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.9154 | -1.38 | -0.41 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.41 | -0.41 | -0.41 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.07 | -1.55 | -0.41 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.55 | -1.55 | -1.55 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.9079 | -1.55 | 0.326 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.449 | 0.326 | 0.572 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9755 | 0.731 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.11 | 0.499 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9588 | 0.459 | 1.43 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Brazil?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Brazil was 1.43 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 1.43 in 2023.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.78 in 1789.
- How does Brazil rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Brazil ranks 41st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.