Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia

Croatia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) was 75 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 190 countries
All-time high
75
in 2003
All-time low
71.88
in 2013
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 752004: 752005: 752006: 752007: 752008: 752009: 752010: 752011: 752012: 752013: 71.92014: 71.92015: 71.92016: 752017: 752018: 752019: 75

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Croatia recorded 75 for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia peaked at 75 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 71.88, in 2013.

That places Croatia 30th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 75 75 75 7
2010s 74.06 71.88 75 10

Countries ranked near Croatia

  1. 27 Israel 78.12 compare
  2. 27 Montenegro 78.12 compare
  3. 27 Thailand 78.12 compare
  4. 30 Afghanistan 75 compare
  5. 30 Bulgaria 75 compare
  6. 30 Chile 75 compare
  7. 30 Denmark 75 compare
  8. 30 Korea 75 compare
  9. 30 Latvia 75 compare
  10. 30 Mauritius 75 compare
  11. 30 Moldova 75 compare
  12. 30 Morocco 75 compare
  13. 30 Spain 75 compare
  14. 30 Sweden 75 compare
  15. 30 Switzerland 75 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Croatia

All data for Croatia →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia?
Resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia was 75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Croatia?
The highest recorded value was 75 in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Croatia?
The lowest recorded value was 71.88 in 2013.
How does Croatia rank for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
Croatia ranks 30th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) rising or falling in Croatia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Croatia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-strength-of-insolvency-framework-index-0-16-score/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-strength-of-insolvency-framework-index-0-16-score/croatia/">Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Croatia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.