Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel
Israel: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) was 78.12 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel stood at 78.12. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is up 56.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel peaked at 78.12 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2003.
That places Israel 27th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 50 | — |
| 2004 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 78.12 | +56.2% |
| 2014 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 7 |
| 2010s | 69.69 | 50 | 78.12 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Israel
- 27 Montenegro 78.12 compare
- 27 Thailand 78.12 compare
- 30 Afghanistan 75 compare
- 30 Bulgaria 75 compare
- 30 Chile 75 compare
- 30 Croatia 75 compare
- 30 Denmark 75 compare
- 30 Republic of Korea 75 compare
- 30 Latvia 75 compare
- 30 Mauritius 75 compare
- 30 Republic of Moldova 75 compare
- 30 Morocco 75 compare
- 30 Spain 75 compare
- 30 Sweden 75 compare
- 30 Switzerland 75 compare
More reference data data for Israel
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0882 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3364 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.719 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0191 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.719 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2959 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1891 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.104 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel?
- Resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Israel was 78.12 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Israel?
- The highest recorded value was 78.12 in 2013.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Israel?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2003.
- How does Israel rank for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Israel ranks 27th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) rising or falling in Israel?
- Over the last ten years it is up 56.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Israel data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.