Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda

Uganda: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
3 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
130th
of 191 countries
All-time high
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda, 2003–2019

01232003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 3 DB15-20 methodology2015: 3 DB15-20 methodology2016: 3 DB15-20 methodology2017: 3 DB15-20 methodology2018: 3 DB15-20 methodology2019: 3 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda is 3 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Uganda 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 2 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 3 DB15-20 methodology +50.0%
2015 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2.6 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 128 Peru 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 128 Saudi Arabia 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 130 Bahamas 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 130 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 130 Bulgaria 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 130 Gambia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 130 Hong Kong, China 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 130 Kyrgyzstan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 130 Lesotho 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 130 Luxembourg 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 130 New Zealand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 130 Panama 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 130 Papua New Guinea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 130 Samoa 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 130 Sierra Leone 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 130 Solomon Islands 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 130 Sri Lanka 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 130 Tonga 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 130 Türkiye 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 130 Uzbekistan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 130 Vanuatu 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 130 Viet Nam 3 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Uganda

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Uganda rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Uganda ranks 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/uganda/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Uganda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.