Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Sierra Leone recorded 3 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Sierra Leone ranks 130th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +50.0% |
| 2010 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.14 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
- 128 Peru 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 128 Saudi Arabia 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Bahamas 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Bolivia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Bulgaria 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Gambia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Hong Kong 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Kyrgyzstan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Lesotho 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Luxembourg 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 New Zealand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Panama 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Papua New Guinea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Samoa 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Solomon Islands 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Sri Lanka 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Tonga 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Turkey 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Uganda 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Uzbekistan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Vanuatu 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 130 Vietnam 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Sierra Leone was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2009.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.