Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
3 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
130th
of 191 countries
All-time high
3 DB15-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan, 2003–2019

11.522.532003201120192003: 1 DB15-20 methodology2004: 1 DB15-20 methodology2005: 1 DB15-20 methodology2006: 1 DB15-20 methodology2007: 1 DB15-20 methodology2008: 1 DB15-20 methodology2009: 1 DB15-20 methodology2010: 1 DB15-20 methodology2011: 1 DB15-20 methodology2012: 1 DB15-20 methodology2013: 1 DB15-20 methodology2014: 1 DB15-20 methodology2015: 1 DB15-20 methodology2016: 1 DB15-20 methodology2017: 1 DB15-20 methodology2018: 3 DB15-20 methodology2019: 3 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan stood at 3 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 200.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2018 and was at its lowest, 1 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Kyrgyzstan 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 1 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3 DB15-20 methodology +200.0%
2019 3 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 1.4 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 3 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 128 Peru 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 128 Saudi Arabia 3.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 130 Bahamas 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 130 Bolivia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 130 Bulgaria 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 130 Gambia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 130 Hong Kong 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 130 Lesotho 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 130 Luxembourg 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 130 New Zealand 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 130 Panama 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 130 Papua New Guinea 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 130 Samoa 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 130 Sierra Leone 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 130 Solomon Islands 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 130 Sri Lanka 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 130 Tonga 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 130 Turkey 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 130 Uganda 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 130 Uzbekistan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 130 Vanuatu 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 130 Vietnam 3 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 200.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.