Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya

Libya: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
4 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 190 countries
All-time high
4 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
4 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya, 2003–2019

012342003201120192003: 4 DB15-20 methodology2004: 4 DB15-20 methodology2005: 4 DB15-20 methodology2006: 4 DB15-20 methodology2007: 4 DB15-20 methodology2008: 4 DB15-20 methodology2009: 4 DB15-20 methodology2010: 4 DB15-20 methodology2011: 4 DB15-20 methodology2012: 4 DB15-20 methodology2013: 4 DB15-20 methodology2014: 4 DB15-20 methodology2015: 4 DB15-20 methodology2016: 4 DB15-20 methodology2017: 4 DB15-20 methodology2018: 4 DB15-20 methodology2019: 4 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya stood at 4 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya peaked at 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 4 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Libya ranks 96th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 4 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 96 Angola 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 96 Argentina 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 96 Burundi 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 96 Cambodia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 96 Croatia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 96 Egypt 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 96 El Salvador 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 96 Honduras 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 96 Iraq 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 96 Jordan 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 96 Kuwait 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 96 Lithuania 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 96 Malawi 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 96 Mauritania 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 96 Republic of Moldova 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 96 Mongolia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 96 Mozambique 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 96 Nepal 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 96 Oman 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 96 Paraguay 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 96 Qatar 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 96 Singapore 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 96 Slovakia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 96 Suriname 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 96 Switzerland 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 96 United Republic of Tanzania 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 96 Ukraine 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 96 Zambia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 96 Zimbabwe 4 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Libya rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Libya ranks 96th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/libya/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.