Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe stood at 4 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe peaked at 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 2.2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 4 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 97 Angola 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Argentina 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Burundi 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Cambodia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Croatia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Egypt 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 El Salvador 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Honduras 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Iraq 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Jordan 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Kuwait 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Libya 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Lithuania 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Malawi 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Mauritania 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Republic of Moldova 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Mongolia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Mozambique 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Nepal 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Oman 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Paraguay 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Qatar 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Sao Tome and Principe 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Singapore 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Slovakia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Suriname 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Switzerland 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Tanzania, United Republic of 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Ukraine 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 97 Zambia 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 (2026)
- Country level monthly temperature anomalies -0.5886 (2026)
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.68 (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies -0.7408 (2025)
- Consumer price index 11,077 (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Zimbabwe was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Zimbabwe ranks 97th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.