Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Myanmar
Myanmar: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Myanmar, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Myanmar recorded 0 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Myanmar peaked at 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
That places Myanmar 164th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
- 164 Bangladesh 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Angola 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Bolivia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Botswana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Gambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Ghana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Guyana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Laos 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Lebanon 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Maldives 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Marshall Islands 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Mauritania 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Micronesia (country) 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Mongolia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Nepal 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Palau 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 San Marino 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Somalia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Saint Lucia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Uruguay 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Zimbabwe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Myanmar
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 164.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 14,068 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.4555 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 3,656 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3,191 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 2,918 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 19,409 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Myanmar?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Myanmar was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Myanmar rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Myanmar ranks 164th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.