Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Marshall Islands, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Marshall Islands recorded 0 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Marshall Islands peaked at 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
That places Marshall Islands 164th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 164 Bangladesh 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Angola 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Bolivia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Botswana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Gambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Ghana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Guyana 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Laos 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Lebanon 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Maldives 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Mauritania 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Micronesia (country) 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Mongolia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Myanmar 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Nepal 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Palau 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 San Marino 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Somalia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Saint Lucia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Uruguay 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 164 Zimbabwe 0 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Marshall Islands
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Political regime lexical 7 (2025)
- Universal suffrage men lexical 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating fh 1 (2025)
- Political regime fh 2 (2025)
- Elections legislature lexical 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Marshall Islands?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Marshall Islands was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 164th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.