Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Afghanistan
-1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Myanmar
-1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
192nd
Myanmar rank
193rd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Myanmar
-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.5199620102025

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Myanmar ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Myanmar ranks 193rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s -2.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Myanmar
2000s -1.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Afghanistan
2010s -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Myanmar
2020s -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Myanmar?
Afghanistan, at -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Myanmar?
0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Myanmar?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Afghanistan and Myanmar rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 192nd and Myanmar ranks 193rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/myanmar/">Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.