Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in North Korea
North Korea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in North Korea, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
North Korea recorded -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025.
That represents a change of down 2.7% on the previous year and up 7.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in North Korea peaked at -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010 and was at its lowest, -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
North Korea ranks 205th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in North Korea, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -2.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.5% |
| 2000 | -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2002 | -2.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.7% |
| 2003 | -2.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2004 | -2.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2005 | -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2006 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2007 | -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2008 | -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | -2.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.2% |
| 2010 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2011 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2012 | -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.8% |
| 2013 | -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | -2.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2015 | -2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2016 | -2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2019 | -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2021 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2024 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
North Korea compared with similar countries
- North Korea's -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for low income countries, which is -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.8× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- North Korea's -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 31.9× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in North Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | -30.8% | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -2.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.98 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.94 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near North Korea
- 202 Turkmenistan -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 203 South Sudan -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 204 Venezuela -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 206 Eritrea -2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for North Korea
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 91.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 245.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 325.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3562 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,873 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 11.62 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in North Korea?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in North Korea was -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in North Korea?
- The highest recorded value was -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in North Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does North Korea rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- North Korea ranks 205th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in North Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this North Korea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.