Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Turkmenistan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Turkmenistan stood at -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 6.5% on the previous year and down 6.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Turkmenistan peaked at -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015 and was at its lowest, -2.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Turkmenistan 202nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Turkmenistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -2.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2000 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2003 | -1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2004 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.4% |
| 2005 | -2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.5% |
| 2006 | -2.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | -2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2008 | -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2009 | -1.95 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2010 | -1.85 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.1% |
| 2011 | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2012 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2013 | -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2015 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2016 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2017 | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2018 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2019 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2020 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2021 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
| 2025 | -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.5% |
Turkmenistan compared with similar countries
- Turkmenistan's -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 20.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Turkmenistan's -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.97 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Turkmenistan
More reference data data for Turkmenistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6549 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5864 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Turkmenistan?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Turkmenistan was -1.88 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The highest recorded value was -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Turkmenistan rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Turkmenistan ranks 202nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Turkmenistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Turkmenistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.