Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Kazakhstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kazakhstan is 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 49.8% on the previous year and up 139.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.1323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2017 and was at its lowest, -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
That places Kazakhstan 91st out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.6562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.7393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.7% |
| 2000 | -0.7534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2002 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.8% |
| 2003 | -0.8774 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2004 | -0.8544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2005 | -0.6093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.7% |
| 2006 | -0.4451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -27.0% |
| 2007 | -0.442 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2008 | -0.3103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.8% |
| 2009 | -0.4269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.6% |
| 2010 | -0.4027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.7% |
| 2011 | -0.3627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2012 | -0.3756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2013 | -0.374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2014 | -0.1937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -48.2% |
| 2015 | -0.0557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -71.2% |
| 2016 | -0.1168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +109.5% |
| 2017 | 0.1323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -213.3% |
| 2018 | 0.1076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.7% |
| 2019 | 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -48.8% |
| 2021 | 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -57.5% |
| 2022 | -0.0627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -361.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -145.2% |
| 2024 | 0.0443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +56.1% |
| 2025 | 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -49.8% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 4% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -361.8% | 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.1531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kazakhstan?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Kazakhstan was 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2017.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 91st out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 139.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.