Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Fiji
Fiji: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Fiji, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Fiji stood at 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 9.9% on the previous year and up 112.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Fiji peaked at 0.1414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.
Fiji ranks 90th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Fiji, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.2678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.2558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2000 | -0.5809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +127.1% |
| 2002 | 0.1283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -122.1% |
| 2003 | -0.238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -285.5% |
| 2004 | -0.7926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +233.0% |
| 2005 | -0.4427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -44.1% |
| 2006 | -0.3441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.3% |
| 2007 | -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.4% |
| 2008 | -0.8375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +79.7% |
| 2009 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.9% |
| 2010 | -0.866 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.1% |
| 2011 | -0.7946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.2% |
| 2012 | -0.7894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2013 | -0.711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2014 | -0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -63.1% |
| 2015 | -0.2594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2016 | -0.2185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.8% |
| 2017 | -0.2162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2018 | -0.215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 0.1414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -165.8% |
| 2020 | -0.1432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -201.2% |
| 2021 | -0.0628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -56.2% |
| 2022 | -0.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +43.4% |
| 2023 | -0.0897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2024 | 0.0359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -140.0% |
| 2025 | 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
Fiji compared with similar countries
- Fiji's 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Fiji's 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.866 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0359 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Fiji
- 87 Dominica 0.0675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 88 Serbia 0.0572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 89 Azerbaijan 0.0512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 91 Kazakhstan 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 92 Jamaica 0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 93 Cape Verde 0.0081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Fiji
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0683 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1992 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.307 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.307 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2292 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0049 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Fiji?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Fiji was 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Fiji?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Fiji?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- How does Fiji rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Fiji ranks 90th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Fiji?
- Over the last ten years it is up 112.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Fiji data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.