Azerbaijan vs Kazakhstan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Azerbaijan
0.0512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kazakhstan
0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
89th
Kazakhstan rank
91st

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Kazakhstan
-1-0.50199620102025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.0512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 2.3 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 91st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan
2000s -0.5771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Azerbaijan
2010s -0.3153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan
2020s -0.0545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan?
Azerbaijan, at 0.0512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan?
0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 91st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Kazakhstan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/kazakhstan/">Azerbaijan vs Kazakhstan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.