Fiji vs Serbia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Fiji
0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Serbia
0.0572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Fiji rank
90th
Serbia rank
88th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Fiji
  • Serbia
-2-1.5-1-0.50199620102025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji, a difference of 0.0249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.8 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 88th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Fiji
2000s -0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Fiji
2010s -0.4191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2020s -0.0529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Fiji or Serbia?
Serbia, at 0.0572 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Fiji and Serbia?
0.0249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Serbia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Fiji and Serbia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Fiji ranks 90th and Serbia ranks 88th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Serbia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/fiji/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/fiji/serbia/">Fiji vs Serbia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.