Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate was 0.5818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Costa Rica, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0.5818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2024.
The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 10.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica peaked at 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Costa Rica 56th out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.5951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica was 0.5818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Costa Rica rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Costa Rica ranks 56th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.