Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Costa Rica, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 3.2% on the previous year and down 15.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica peaked at 0.7789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
That places Costa Rica 56th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.6935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +60.3% |
| 2000 | 0.7789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.3% |
| 2002 | 0.373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -52.1% |
| 2003 | 0.4246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.8% |
| 2004 | 0.6058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +42.7% |
| 2005 | 0.7038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.2% |
| 2006 | 0.5864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.7% |
| 2007 | 0.619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.6% |
| 2008 | 0.7625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.2% |
| 2009 | 0.7496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.6358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2011 | 0.5892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2012 | 0.7012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.0% |
| 2013 | 0.7556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 0.5648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.2% |
| 2015 | 0.6372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.8% |
| 2016 | 0.677 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2017 | 0.5819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.0% |
| 2018 | 0.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.6% |
| 2019 | 0.7006 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.5781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.5% |
| 2021 | 0.5983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2022 | 0.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.3% |
| 2023 | 0.5012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.4% |
| 2024 | 0.5214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
| 2025 | 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 59% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.6226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 53 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.5832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 54 Portugal 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Uruguay 0.5522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 57 North Macedonia 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 58 Palau 0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 59 Croatia 0.435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Costa Rica was 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7789 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Costa Rica rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Costa Rica ranks 56th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.