Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Portugal
Portugal: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Portugal, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Portugal is 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.
The figure is down 16.1% on the previous year and down 39.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Portugal peaked at 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2025.
Portugal ranks 54th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Portugal, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.6% |
| 2000 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.8% |
| 2002 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.4% |
| 2003 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2004 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2005 | 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.1% |
| 2006 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2008 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 0.9716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.2% |
| 2011 | 0.7876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.9% |
| 2012 | 0.7498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2013 | 0.8119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.3% |
| 2014 | 0.6697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.5% |
| 2015 | 0.9253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.2% |
| 2016 | 0.912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2017 | 0.9894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.5% |
| 2018 | 0.9968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2019 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.4% |
| 2020 | 0.8623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.7% |
| 2021 | 0.8007 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.1% |
| 2022 | 0.8548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2023 | 0.7094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.0% |
| 2024 | 0.6688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.7% |
| 2025 | 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.2% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 62% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 92% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.8874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
- 51 Bermuda 0.6123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 52 Italy 0.598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 53 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.5832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Uruguay 0.5522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 56 Costa Rica 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 57 North Macedonia 0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Portugal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5144 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4372 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2572 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Portugal?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Portugal was 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5608 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- How does Portugal rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Portugal ranks 54th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.