Costa Rica vs Palau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Costa Rica
0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Palau
0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
56th
Palau rank
58th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Palau
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau, a difference of 0.0931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Palau's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 56th and Palau ranks 58th of 206 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 0.756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2010s 0.6533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica
2020s 0.5612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Costa Rica or Palau?
Costa Rica, at 0.5381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Palau as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Costa Rica and Palau?
0.0931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Palau?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Palau rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Costa Rica ranks 56th and Palau ranks 58th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Palau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/costa-rica/palau/">Costa Rica vs Palau: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.