China vs El Salvador: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

China
-0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
El Salvador
-0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
China rank
104th
El Salvador rank
107th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.250.5199620102025

How they compare

China currently reports -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 104th and El Salvador ranks 107th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.3244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s -0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.0801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, China or El Salvador?
China, at -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between China and El Salvador?
0.0307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
China ranks 104th and El Salvador ranks 107th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.