Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) by country

The extent of shareholder rights index measures the role of shareholders in key corporate decisions. It has six components: (i) whether the sale of 51% of Buyer’s assets requires shareholder approval; (ii) whether shareholders representing 10% of Buyer’s share capital have the right to call for a meeting of...

Countries reporting
131
Highest
6 DB15-20 methodology
Argentina
Lowest
1 DB15-20 methodology
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
Median
4 DB15-20 methodology
Years covered
7
2013–2019
Data points
1,337

What the numbers show

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) is currently reported for 131 countries. The highest value is 6 DB15-20 methodology in Argentina; the lowest is 1 DB15-20 methodology in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of.

The median across all reporting countries is 4 DB15-20 methodology, and the mean is 4.3 DB15-20 methodology.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 6.

Over the past decade 20 countries rose and 2 fell. The largest increase was in Egypt (up 200.0%), and the largest decrease in Costa Rica (down 33.3%).

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Argentina 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Bulgaria 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Chile 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Cyprus 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% rising
1 Egypt 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% rising
1 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% rising
1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Croatia 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 India 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kazakhstan 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
1 Kenya 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% flat
1 Morocco 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 20.0% rising
1 Malta 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Panama 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Peru 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Papua New Guinea 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Slovenia 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Türkiye 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Zimbabwe 6 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Austria 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Bahrain 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 25.0% rising
20 Bahamas 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Switzerland 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 China 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 150.0% rising
20 Czechia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Germany 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Denmark 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Ecuador 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Estonia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Finland 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Georgia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 66.7% rising
20 Ghana 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Greece 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Hong Kong 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Indonesia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 66.7% rising
20 Ireland 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 25.0% rising
20 Iraq 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Iceland 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Italy 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Jamaica 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Sri Lanka 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Latvia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Republic of Moldova 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Mexico 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 North Macedonia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Mauritius 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Malawi 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 25.0% rising
20 Malaysia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Netherlands 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Norway 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Nepal 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 New Zealand 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Pakistan 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Poland 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Romania 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Russian Federation 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 25.0% rising
20 Saudi Arabia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 25.0% rising
20 Singapore 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Serbia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Slovakia 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Sweden 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 Thailand 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 66.7% rising
20 Trinidad and Tobago 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
20 South Africa 5 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 United Arab Emirates 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
65 Australia 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Belgium 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Benin 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Burkina Faso 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Bangladesh 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Brazil 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Botswana 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Canada 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Côte d'Ivoire 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Colombia 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Fiji 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 France 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Guinea-Bissau 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Guyana 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Hungary 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Israel 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Japan 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Republic of Korea 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Lithuania 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Luxembourg 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Mali 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Niger 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Nigeria 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Oman 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
65 Senegal 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 El Salvador 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Suriname 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Togo 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Tunisia 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Ukraine 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Uzbekistan 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
65 Viet Nam 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
65 Zambia 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
65 Taiwan 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Antigua and Barbuda 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Belarus 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Barbados 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Bhutan 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 down 25.0% falling
102 Dominica 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Guatemala 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Honduras 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Iran 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Lebanon 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Saint Lucia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Montenegro 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Namibia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Qatar 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Syria 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Uganda 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
102 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 Costa Rica 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 down 33.3% falling
121 Grenada 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 Jordan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
121 Kuwait 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 Mongolia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 Palestine, State of 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
121 United States 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
129 Philippines 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 volatile
129 Puerto Rico 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
129 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-shareholder-rights-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-shareholder-rights-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The extent of shareholder rights index measures the role of shareholders in key corporate decisions. It has six components: (i) whether the sale of 51% of Buyer’s assets requires shareholder approval; (ii) whether shareholders representing 10% of Buyer’s share capital have the right to call for a meeting of shareholders; (iii) whether Buyer must obtain its share­holders’ approval every time it issues new shares; (iv) whether shareholders automatically receive preemption rights when Buyer issues new shares; (v) whether shareholders elect and dismiss the external auditor; (vi) whether changes to the rights of a class of shares are only possible if the holders of the affected shares approve. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.