Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan
Taiwan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 90 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan is 90, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 28.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan peaked at 90 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2005.
That places Taiwan 14th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 70 | — |
| 2006 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90 | +28.6% |
| 2013 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 70 | 5 |
| 2010s | 86 | 70 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan
- 14 Albania 90 compare
- 14 Colombia 90 compare
- 14 Cyprus 90 compare
- 14 Georgia 90 compare
- 14 Greece 90 compare
- 14 Ireland 90 compare
- 14 Kazakhstan 90 compare
- 14 Kosovo 90 compare
- 14 Lebanon 90 compare
- 14 Morocco 90 compare
- 14 Peru 90 compare
- 14 Philippines 90 compare
- 14 Romania 90 compare
- 14 Saudi Arabia 90 compare
- 14 Turkey 90 compare
- 14 Ukraine 90 compare
- 14 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 90 compare
More reference data data for Taiwan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 360.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 111.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 46.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,323 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 400.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 306.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 2,013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Taiwan was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Taiwan?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2012.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Taiwan?
- The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
- How does Taiwan rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Taiwan ranks 14th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Taiwan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Taiwan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.