Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco
Morocco: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 90 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco is 90, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 80.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco peaked at 90 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2005.
Morocco ranks 14th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 50 | — |
| 2006 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 60 | +20.0% |
| 2011 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 60 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90 | +50.0% |
| 2017 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 50 | 50 | 5 |
| 2010s | 72 | 60 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
- 14 Albania 90 compare
- 14 Colombia 90 compare
- 14 Cyprus 90 compare
- 14 Georgia 90 compare
- 14 Greece 90 compare
- 14 Ireland 90 compare
- 14 Kazakhstan 90 compare
- 14 Kosovo 90 compare
- 14 Lebanon 90 compare
- 14 Peru 90 compare
- 14 Philippines 90 compare
- 14 Romania 90 compare
- 14 Saudi Arabia 90 compare
- 14 Taiwan 90 compare
- 14 Türkiye 90 compare
- 14 Ukraine 90 compare
- 14 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 90 compare
More reference data data for Morocco
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4441 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Morocco was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2016.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2005.
- How does Morocco rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Morocco ranks 14th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is up 80.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.